Facts on the Nuclear Energy Situation in Japan (Update)

March 15, 2011

Update: April 6, 2011: We’ve added new details about GE’s disaster relief efforts following a visit to Japan by GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt.

Update: March 18, 2011: Read “Setting the Record Straight on Mark I Containment” about the performance of the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant.

Update: March 17, 2011: We’ve added new details regarding our disaster relief efforts in Japan.

Update: March 16, 2011. Click here to read about the Mark I containment units used at the reactors.

Update: March 15, 2011: GE’s thoughts and condolences continue to be with the people of Japan affected by the devastating impact of last Friday’s unprecedented natural disaster. And GE officials continue to closely monitor the events at the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, which suffered a loss of power after the tsunami struck the site.

During the magnitude 9.0 earthquake (the fifth largest earthquake in recorded history), the GE Boiling Water Reactors (BWR), performed as designed and initiated safe shut down processes. We understand that the back-up generators performed as designed to begin the cooling process. Shortly thereafter, we understand that the tsunami disabled the back-up emergency generation systems.

Immediately following the earthquake and tsunami, Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy (GE’s nuclear joint venture with Hitachi based in Japan) communicated to the Japanese Government and Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the plant operator, that we were ready to assist them. The GE and Hitachi alliance assembled incident response and engineering teams in Tokyo and Wilmington, NC to provide 24/7 support.

While TEPCO is managing the response efforts, GE has been offering its assistance from the beginning and is now taking a number of additional actions, including:

  • Providing technical assistance to TEPCO through our joint venture partners in Japan
  • Providing technical assistance to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which is in turn providing assistance to the Japanese government
  • GE’s cross-functional business teams are coordinating engineering and project resources as well as equipment availabilities to support equipment delivery in Japan. GE’s Aeroderivative business is working to send 10 GE truck-mounted gas turbines (TM2500 22.5MW) which can provide temporary power. Units are available and we are working with partners to prioritize needs and finalize arrangements.
  • Engaging our network of more than 1,000 engineers within GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy to provide technical assistance to the NRC, Nuclear Energy Institute, the government of Japan and TEPCO.

Reactor Safety:

  • The fleet of GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) BWR reactors has a proven track record of performing reliably and safely for more than 40 years.
  • GE has been in the nuclear industry for more than half a century. There are currently 92 GE-built BWR plants and plants using the licensed GE BWR design operating globally. Our BWR designs meet the rigorous regulatory requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other government regulators and have proven to be safe and reliable. Our reactors are one of the workhorses of the industry.
  • The Unit 1 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi site went into commercial operation in 1971; it is a BWR-3, with a Mark I containment system. That means that the reactor is the third generation of the BWR design. The reactor in Unit 1 is the same type as several reactors in the U.S., although every reactor is designed specifically for each project and site. All GEH BWR designs meet all NRC requirements for safe operation during and after an earthquake for the areas where they are licensed and sited.
  • BWR reactors are designed to be able to safely shutdown in the event of an earthquake or other natural disaster.

What is GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy?

  • The global nuclear alliance was formed by combining GE and Hitachi’s nuclear businesses. The timeline at the bottom shows how GE and Hitachi independently progressed since the 1950s, ultimately combining operations in 2007 to create GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy.
  • In 2010, GEH had approximately $1 billion in revenue for GE.
  • Our global nuclear alliance is recognized as the world’s foremost developer of boiling water reactors, robust fuel cycle products, and highly valued nuclear plant services. Beginning in the 1950s, we developed breakthrough light water technology with the Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). Since that time, GE has developed nine evolutions of BWR technology including the ABWR, the world’s first operational Generation III Class advanced light water design and, most recently, the ESBWR, our latest Generation III+ Class design that combines advanced safety features, improved economics, and new operational efficiencies. The first ABWR became operational in Japan in 1996.
  • GEH also offers a wide range of services that can improve performance, increase power output, and extend plant life.
  • GEH’s fuel cycle business supplies reliable fuel products and services to utilities all around the globe.
  • Japan, like most countries with nuclear power, has a channeling law under which the operator and government are liable for damage to third parties and the operator carries insurance. Suppliers bear no liability under the law.

The following links are supplied by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and offer additional information on the situation in Japan:

Nuclear Energy Situation in Japan: This page includes frequently asked questions about the situation with Japan’s nuclear energy plants, a time line of events, graphics of the nuclear power reactors and other general statistics on Japan’s nuclear energy program.

Radiation and Japan’s Nuclear Energy Plants: This page provides background information on radiation, including its different sources, how it is measured, and the ways federal authorities protect the public and workers from radiation exposure. It also explains how the Japanese plant operators are using a process called “venting” to manage the temperature and pressure of the reactor vessels and protect the integrity of the primary containment.

Reactor Designs:This page describes how nuclear plants are designed and constructed to withstand natural disasters, including: earthquakes, tsunamis, fires and other natural or man-made events.

NEI Backgrounders: Fact Sheets and Policy Briefs: This page includes fact sheets and policy briefs on environmental protection, safety and security, and nuclear waste and used nuclear fuel management


GEH Timeline

GEH Timeline: Click to enlarge. Use your icon to zoom further, or the view tab on your browser.

Published March 14, 2011: As the people of Japan work to recover from the devastating impact of Friday’s unprecedented natural disaster, GE offers its heartfelt condolences — and ongoing help. Japanese authorities are working around the clock to ensure the safety of the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Power Plant, which was damaged by a tsunami following the initial earthquake.

At a press conference yesterday in India, GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt — there as part of a previously planned business visit — said, “Clearly we are offering any kind of technical assistance to our customer TEPCO and the government of Japan as they go through the recovery efforts with the nuclear power plants. Our first priority is to support the government and people of Japan.”

To that end, he announced that GE and the GE Foundation, the company’s philanthropic arm, will be committing $5 million in cash, equipment and services toward relief in the coming weeks and months. GE is currently working with disaster relief organizations, GE regional business leaders and the Japanese government to determine what specific additional GE support can be provided to best complement Japan’s response capacity.

Immelt, who also visited Japan’s embassy in New Delhi to personally express GE’s deepest sympathy to the government and people of Japan, explained to the press, “I think we just have to let the discovery take place…we are going to be supportive and transparent in that process.”


This entry was posted in Japan, Nuclear, Other, Stories. Bookmark the permalink.
  • BobinPgh

    Well GE, there is still a lot your company can do. There must be some GE facilities nearby that have some extra tanks they don’t need – ship them over to the plant to hold the water. Perhaps it might be possible to dig a pond and line it with a GE plastic so the water willnot go into the groundwater. GE may not make water pumps but why not use a GE credit card to buy some pumps at the local TSC store (whatever it is in Japan)? There must be some kind of GE waterproof service equipment they can use. Come on, GE, if there was ever a place that needs your products this is it!

  • stu

    I have 35 yrs experience at various plants with the Mark 1. I was a licensed operator on two such units. The containment is robust and is not the issue. In fact, virtually every design limit has probably been exceeded on units 1-3 multiple times and yet to date the containments appear to be in tact. Now if conditions degrade they may not stay that way. A flooding condition that results in a loss of AC and then DC power will result in fuel damage if it is not recovered. We need to focus upon external events and extending our ability to withstand blackout conditions and stop the chatter on containment.
    The big question i have is if they have the hard pipe vents then why the hydrogen explosions.

  • joseph gonsalves

    on 3/19/11 i posted a comment suggesting nitrogen should be sent into the reactors to create an inert atmosphere that would prevent any fire from taking place. on 3/26/11 the u.s. nuclear regulatory commission sent a letter to japan suggesting that nitrogen be used to prevent hydrogen explosion did i think of this first?

  • bill

    If I were an expert in the measurement of airborne particulate radioactivity, and if I had recently extended some earlier published work of mine in this area, and had thus found a potentially very useful and new way of assessing this airborne radioactivity at the damaged plants, how would I go about offering to help with these measurements for the protection of the workers, for free, other than waiting a year or so for this material to be published in a journal? Could GE help in any way with this?

  • Curious George

    GE, please comment on all the Stuxnet nonsense going on out there concerning Fukushima.
    I doubt there even a single Siemens S7 (or compatible) Industrial Controller on the site (and if so what does it do)?

  • T Forgatsch

    I’m a stock holder with a solution for ge’s Dai’ichi reactor leaks .There is a oil drilling sealer that will seal thereactor core fractures. Broadleaf p-4 is a polyacrylamide co-polymer that will take the core heat yet allow cooling with out losing water. Thematerial is a dry crystal that absorbs water and forms a gel that forms a dam like solid with out cutting cooling effect. IT is non -flamable as is > 60 % water, fresh or sea water does not matter. You can add it in hydrated or dry in to water and it will gel out. 541-347-9071

  • Close the barn door

    Thanks for all the solutions from amateur engineers.

    If we had any sense maybe instead we would be talking about why these plants and their spent fuel pools should be allowed to exist at all, considering how they self destruct when the power goes out, even if nothing else goes wrong.

    Maybe we should think of this type of power generation, which uses less than one percent of the fissile energy in the fuel and converts the rest into an eternal toxic legacy, as radioactive terrorism.

  • Herb Engstrom

    My understanding is that in light water reactors, water is both the coolant and the moderator so that when a loss of coolant accident occurs, the reactor shuts down automatically. Evidently, this did not happen at Fukushima. Why not?

  • Mike

    This layman’s analysis: The (flawed) design assumption seems to be that site power can be restored within some relatively short fixed time once the reactor core isolation loop is activated. The torus is not an infinite heat sink, and it needs to be bathed in cooling water for the reactor to be able to run for extended times in this mode. This requires some additional penetrations of secondary containment, and addition of steam-driven turbine pumps to move this extra cooling water. If the torus stays cool, there’s never a need to vent steam, and the core remains covered and relatively cool. Control valves need to be designed to stay in this mode without power (once activated), because the batteries are going to give out eventually. The reactor should be self-sustaining in this mode without reliance on AC or DC power. It is, after all, making its own steam or you wouldn’t have this problem.

    All design and failure mode assumptions need to be identified and analyzed – again!

  • Mike

    @Herb Engstrom: What makes you say that the reactor didn’t shut down? Or, maybe, what’s your definition of “shut down”? “Shut Down” does not equal “cold”; it is a (necessary) step in getting to “cold”. Once the control rods stop the nuclear fission, there’s still a lot of radioactive decay (read “heat production”) going on. The cooling must continue to run for a long time or overheating will occur. It appears to me ( a layman) that one of the last-ditch cooling modes has a time limit that was exceeded.

  • Dave

    GE – you have some explaining to do. Containment now lost on 3 reactors. No end in sight to the radioactive releases. Total silence about the plutonium and uranium releases into the environment. As a mechanical engineer with Master’s degree, I strongly feel that nuclear fission is a VERY dangerous way to boil water. The risks to our health seem very high.

  • JFK

    some day GE will tell the truth; goodbye JSF!!

    Ohio nuclear plant with cracked concrete restarts
    Posted 12/6/2011 11:00 AM ET E-mail | Save | Print

    By John Seewer, Associated Press
    TOLEDO, Ohio — A nuclear reactor in Ohio is running again, less than two months after cracks were discovered in the plant’s concrete shell.
    FirstEnergy Corp. says its Davis-Besse (BEH’-see) nuclear plant outside Toledo began producing electricity Tuesday morning and should be at full power later this week.

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Friday gave the utility the green light to restart the plant after saying FirstEnergy provided reasonable assurance that the cracks don’t pose a threat.

    Regulators say they’ve also done their own checks and reviewed testing already completed by the plant operator.

    An Ohio congressman criticized the decision, saying that it’s still not known what caused the cracks or whether it’s a bigger problem.

    The cracks were discovered while the plant was closed to replace its reactor head.

    Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Posted 12/6/2011 11:00 AM ET