GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Proposed to Turn World’s Biggest Civilian Plutonium Stockpile into Electricity

December 7, 2011

GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy has proposed to the U.K. government to build an advanced nuclear reactor that would consume the country’s stockpile of radioactive plutonium. The technology called PRISM, or Power Reactor Innovative Small Module, would use the plutonium to generate low-carbon electricity.

The U.K. has the world’s largest civilian stockpile of plutonium. The size of the stockpile is 87 tons and growing.

Nuclear reactors unlock energy by splitting atoms of the material stored in fuel rods. This process is called fission. For fission to be effective, neutrons – the nuclear particles that do the splitting and keep the reaction going – must maintain the right speed. Conventional reactors use water to cool and slow down neutrons, keeping fission effective. But water-cooled reactors leave some 95 percent of the fuel’s potential energy untapped.

PRISM is a so-called “fast reactor.” It uses liquid sodium, rather than water, to cool the reactor. The sodium allows the neutrons to maintain higher energies and to cause fission in elements such as plutonium more efficiently than water-cooled reactors.

PRISM incorporates “passive safety” features and can shut down automatically, in the unlikely event that it should be needed. PRISM does not need any automatic systems, valves or operators, to remove reactor heat after a shutdown with a complete loss electrical power.

Another benefit is PRISM’s relatively small size and simplified design. The reactor can be built in modules and transported to the power plant site, lowering the costs and adding another level of component control.

The plutonium is stockpiled in the coastal town of Sellafield in northern England. The Guardian newspaper reported that storing this plutonium costs the British government a significant amount of money per year to maintain. “Some in government want the plutonium to be classed as an asset, rather than a liability,” the newspaper wrote. GEH said that the PRISM reactor would use practically all the stored plutonium at Sellafield to create low-carbon electricity, turning it into an asset.

The PRISM reactor is very different from other proposals to process plutonium, including turning the spent fuel into mixed oxide (MOX). The PRISM reactor actually disposes of a great majority of the plutonium as opposed to simply reusing it over again without ever actually ridding the planet of the substance.

 


This entry was posted in Energy, Other and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Russell Cage

    The tiny footprint and minimal impact of the S-PRISM is worth comparing to other sources of low-carbon energy. The capacity factor of nuclear reactors (upwards of 90%) also compares very favorably.

    England in particular is facing a looming electric power crisis, as “the market” has built cheap natural-gas plants in the face of market uncertainty and a mandate to lower carbon emissions, but North Sea gas supplies are falling rapidly and the pipelines for imports are fully subscribed. Turning Sellafield’s plutonium into electricity is a way to supply much-needed breathing room.

  • Jeff Magee

    The article makes it sound so innocuous. I am a strong proponent of nuclear energy and know this is a brief introduction to an extreme engineering challenge.. What is the rub? I wish you would expand on the the pros and cons of this science. The more transparent we are to the risks, the easier it will be to satisfy all, that no stone goes unturned in confronting the associated challenges… It is imperative that nuclear be part of any comprehensive plan for meeting demands for clean energy. I am proud of GE being a part of that process.

  • Russell Cage

    I believe that many of the engineering issues were solved by the EBR I and EBR II, and the technology was going to be proven at commercial scale by the Integral Fast Reactor. Unfortunately, the IFR was cancelled by Congress just weeks before the 1994 elections.

    The major detail remaining to be demonstrated at commercial scale is the electrolytic fuel reprocessing. You can find a great deal about “pyroprocessing” with a web search, but the money to build and run full-scale pyroprocessing units died with the IFR. We used to be years ahead of Russia and decades ahead of China, and now we’re behind both of them.

  • Costas Spalaris

    The success of sodium cooled reactors hinges upon the proper design and MATERIAL selection for the steam generators. PRISM’s technology basis is not “a given”, as EBRII had a very ineficient steam generator featuring double wall.
    There are very few details of the PRISM design available for any one to access its potential.

  • Russell Cage

    Sodium-cooled reactors may not have steam generators. Supercritical CO2 turbines have greater efficiency than steam, as well as being much smaller. The chance of a water/sodium fire with secondary hydrogen explosions is non-existent when the working fluid is not water and has no hydrogen.

  • Russell Cage

    If I recall correctly the current design of S-PRISM does use a steam cycle, but until the construction permits are granted nothing is set in stone.

    Work on supercritical CO2 is progressing. See this:
    http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2011/03/07/sandia-national-labs_2700_-supercritical-co2-turbine-could-greatly-improve-efficiency-of-nuclear-generation030703.aspx