See What More Efficient Air Travel Looks Like

May 10, 2011

Boarded a plane recently? You’ve no doubt noticed that air traffic delays are bad, and they’re only getting worse — much worse. In 2009, 100 million system delay minutes cost U.S. passenger airlines nearly $6.1 billion, and those numbers just keep on rising.

One thing’s for certain: We need technology to rescue our struggling air travel system. And one such technology is GE’s Required Navigation Performance (RNP) landing approaches. This technology lets planes fly precisely-defined flight paths without relying on outdated, ground-based radio navigation — rather, it works with precise satellite navigation and advanced tech aboard the aircraft, creating shorter and more efficient flight paths that reduce delays and alleviate air traffic.

According to a new study, Highways in the Sky, deploying RNP at 46 mid-size U.S. airports could save the following:

 

  • 12.9 million gallons of fuel
  • 274.6 million pounds of carbon dioxide
  • 17,900 hours
  • and $65.6 million in operational costs

The infographic below charts the massive effect RNP could have in 46 American cities:

 

In the videos below, GE Aviation Fellow and pilot Steve Fulton describes the differences between traditional flight paths and RNP-determined paths, and the practical implications of making the shift:

The video and animation below show the RNP approach at Connecticut’s Bradley Airport:


This entry was posted in Aviation, Ecomagination, Graphics, Innovation, Other, Videos and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Manish Sharma

    Hi
    Its a fascinating product. I believe the competitor like Honeywell already has a GBAS system. Would love to see a differentiator/comparision plus where are we in terms of real time installation beyond Bradley.
    http://www51.honeywell.com/honeywell/news-events/press-releases-details/03.17.09QantasA380.html

    Regards
    Manish

  • John Moroney

    I have no doubt that your airport soultion works and saves a lot of fuel, however, the figures given on your airport graphics are incorrect and do not agree with the overall fingure you provide of 12.9million gallons saved per annum. For example, you claim a saving of 55,649 gallons per minute at Albany, NY which is equal to 80.1 million gallons per day. Not even US aircraft can need that much fuel!