The Real GE

September 15, 2011

There has been a lot of talk lately about GE and what some call crony capitalism. Unfortunately, those same people don’t want the facts to get in the way of their political rhetoric.

So here are the facts:

GE is one of the largest private employers in the United States, employing 133,000 individuals. GE is growing and investing in the United States and creating jobs. Since 2009, GE has announced the creation of 8,000 new US jobs, 7,000 of which are manufacturing jobs. GE people are hard at work every day trying to make the world work better whether by making quality health care more affordable, finding new energy solutions, or building jet engines. GE people figure out what the world needs and then build it. In fact, today, we announced that we are investing $1 billion to help fight cancer, with an initial focus on breast cancer. That’s GE.

We are also growing around the world and that makes GE stronger in the U.S. We are the nation’s second-largest exporter because we have invested billions of dollars in technology. These exports support tens of thousands of U.S. jobs.

That’s who we are. Here’s who we are not.

We are not receiving special treatment; we compete for business just like every other company. Last year, only 4 percent of our revenue came from sales to the U.S. government. Of that, 75 percent was the result of jet engines that we provide to the U.S. military. We are a large company but only the 33rd largest contractor to the U.S. government.

We’re also not the company who somehow escaped paying any taxes.

We actually paid significant taxes in 2010 for previous years and $1 billion in state, local and other taxes. Our tax rate was low in 2010 because we lost $32 billion in our financial services business during the global financial crisis. This was not a tax avoidance strategy, it was a business loss. Even so, GE remains in favor of comprehensive tax reform, reform which eliminates loopholes and establishes a territorial system like the rest of the world. We would welcome the opportunity to focus on making things the world needs and not on complying with the Byzantine tax structure as it exists.

GE plays by the rules. We play to compete, to create jobs, and to solve the world’s toughest problems. That’s the real GE.


This entry was posted in Jobs, Other and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Naveen

    These are great facts especially for a new hire like me.
    Proud to work at GE.

  • Dennis

    Play it loud and play it clear…..and let the world know why we are here

  • Kelly Baird

    I don’t think that GE has to validate it’s roll in creating jobs , research and other noble causes to anyone. If people are so nearsighted that they can’t see what GE does for the United States economy and for that matter the global economy, then they realy don’t need an explanation.
    GE is a business just like every other business. They are trying to make money. All of the other things that they do for people is just a plus. Obviously they spend a lot of time and money on causes not related to creating business. Keep your head up about the critisism and keep moving forward. I know you will.

  • Vince Bingham

    Why did Obama need a second engine for the F-35 “lighting” when Rolls already had a engine for it? Just a muti million dllar ‘extra” engine. Can you explain GE?

  • Vince Bingham

    Is GE exempt from Obamacre? I know you people that work there are happy with GE, of course you work there. GE used to be one of the positive company that made great things. Greed got in the way.

  • justthefacts

    From the Washington Examiner:
    =================================
    Now here are some more GE claims, and some of responses

    “We are not receiving special treatment”

    This is a hard one to believe. GE, again, spends more on lobbying than any other company. Its lobbyists include Linda Daschle, whose husband Tom was the Senate Majority Leader and today is a confidant of Obama. Former senior Ways & Means Committee member Jim McCrery is a lobbyist for GE as is former House Democratic Leader Dick Gephardt. Former Senators Trent Lott and John Breaux are GE lobbyists. Immelt has been an official advisor to Obama through his whole presidency.

    I think GE needs to explain what it means by “special treatment.”

    “Last year, only 4 percent of our revenue came from sales to the U.S. government.”

    This is really off target. The dig at GE is not that it makes all its money selling to the U.S. government. It’s that it finds all sorts of ways to profit off of big government, including subsidies and regulations.

    Off the top of my head, here are a few ways:

    GE is a top beneficiary of Export-Import Bank subsidies.
    GE launched an embryonic stem-cell business just after President Obama announced the government would start subsidizing them.
    GE owns half of Greenhouse Gas Services, a business that generates and trades in greenhouse-gas credits — something that only has value if government constrains GHG emissions.
    GE is a leading manufacturer of wind turbines, which receive all sorts of federal and state subsidies.
    GE lobbied for and benefits from the light-bulb efficiency regulations that drive consumers to more expensive light bulbs.
    On the state level, GE gets generous “incentives” (subsidies) from governments. Consider this Virginia case.
    GE got $140 billion bailout from the FDIC in 2008.

    I would like GE to explain why this isn’t corporatism or crony capitalism.

  • Bob Haywood

    You raked in billions from the US in both consumer dollars and taxpayer subsidies. You returned $0 in taxes. It’s not hard to claim you play by the rules when your lobbyists write them.

    When I write my Senator or Congressman I get a form letter. When Jeff writes a letter he gets the Lincoln Bedroom.

    Maybe it’s hard to recognize special treatment when you’ve grown so accustomed to it you take it for granted.

  • Maynard

    While GE is doubtlessly correct and within the scope of the law with the effects of deductions on their final tax bill. they have been woefully shortsighted with respect to the public perception that a company with the global and US presence of GE paid no 2010 income tax. They have failed epically at what GE likes to call “the newspaper test”. Always think what a given action will look like if it becomes spread across the headlines of the newspaper. Someone had to know what pundits on the left and right would make of this especially when GE received TARP assistance, has a well publicized overseas presence, and the CEO is very publically aligned with President Obama. There may have been little that could be done to blunt the criticism, but the overall impression leaves people looking askance at GE.

  • Socraticsilliness

    Jeffrey Immelt-Jobs Czar…all the jobs in China. $14 billion in income, not a shekel for the public coffers. Your consumer products made in China…good for a year and a half, broken. All the public money GE happily sucks up. GE, you’re a snake in the grass.

  • V.L.

    As long as the corporation pay taxes they will want to have influence. So even though that it sounds such a radical idea at first, I believe that the corporation should not pay any corporate income taxes. Many of the large international corporations making huge profits get tax credits for taxes paid to other countries. So why not eliminate the corporate income tax completely? The corporate income taxes bring some 10% of the total revenues to the US Treasury, but I believe that could be offset with creating more attractive market to invest in and create more jobs (=taxpayers).

  • Kevin

    Who are GE trying to kid with this? Immelt is Obama’s tool.

  • 2moogee

    Wow, GE must really be bad to have such harsh comments on their web site. Truth Dig says that GE Capital contributed to the housing bubble too. Not that they also got special protection from the GOV with their consolidated debt securities/toxic assets that the GOV bought to save the banks from going under (don’t get started on TARP), but through deregulation of the housing sector that allowed subprime lending to happen; oops, did I say FED and Tim Geithner/overseas bailouts w/out congressional approval using tax payer dollars? Geese, what’s next? Making the CEO of GE job czar of another stimulus? Oh, that’s right, I wonder who will get a cut of that?

  • Dharanesh B.k

    I personally feel great see the EHS intiatives at GE. So much emphasis is given on EHS and social activity..

  • david foster

    The perception of GE as a crony-capitalist company comes, I believe, largely from two factors:

    1)GE’s continuous hyping of “alternative energy,” in the form of wind and solar technologies whose large-scale adoption is dependent almost entirely on government coercion and/or subsidy. Overstatement of the economic potential of these technologies supports regulatory overreach such as the EPA’s current initiatives which would result in the shutdown of many coal plants.

    2)The strong left-wing position taken by GE’s (now former) media assets, particularly but not limited to MSNBC. (It has also been reported that Mr Immelt personally chastised CNBC reporters for not being nice enough to Obama. I haven’t seen any denials of this—if it’s not true, GE really needs to say something.)

    A certain amount of sucking up toward the administration in power is probably inevitable for a company as large, high-profile, and complex as GE, but my perception and that of many others is that under Jeff’s leadership GE has taken it way too far.

    There are a lot of GE investors, executives, and employees who are not leftists or environmental extremists and who do not appreciate the use of the company’s name and assets to promote views with which they are in strong disagreement.

  • David Paris

    Wow! All the negative comments sound more like partisan bickering, than legitimate concerns, look how many times Obama/Obamacare were mentioned. For a company as large as General Electric I think that they are doing a fine job. They added about 8000 jobs here in the USA, no small accomplishment in this economy. In regards to GE’s contribution to the housing bubble, I personally can’t blame them for taking advantage of deregulation, and I haven’t heard their name mentioned in the same sentence as AIG, Lehman Bros, or Country Wide.All I have to say is… Keep Up The Good Work General Electric!

  • chy12

    It’s clear by the sheer volume of items in Infinitely Kusama that Vuitton exp.Louis Vuitton Outlet Store Purese this assortment to be successful within the vein of past collaborations with Stephen Sprouse and Takashi Murakami. the corporate allowed her to speckle nearly each variety of piece that it makes, as well as a extremely fun look ahead to ad campaigns! Twice a year, brands roll out pictures meant to sell their ideas of their collections to the general public, and since purses and accessories are therefore critically vital to the monetary wellbeing o.

  • starchild

    Employing lots of people doesn’t justify GE taking a $140 billion bailout paid for with money stolen from American taxpayers. Collectively, many small businesses that go bankrupt every year as a result of poor economic conditions employ lots of people too, but they didn’t get government bailouts.

    If they had to go hat in hand to government, shouldn’t the CEO and other top GE executives have had to sacrifice their pay? How much were they each paid in 2008?

  • starchild

    Oh, here’s some of that info on executive pay at GE:

    “…even though GE CEO Jeff Immelt decided to forego his 2008 bonus (which the board granted to him even though he missed every one of his performance measures) other GE executives are receiving their bonuses– in some cases millions of dollars.”

    “Chief Financial Officer Keith Sherin and Vice Chairman Michael Neal were given 2008 bonuses of $5.2 million and $5.8 million, and chose to return only half. The average GE executive bonus only dropped 19 percent from 2007, even thought GE stock lost 53 percent of its value.”

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/01/21/worst-bailout-in-u-s-history-general-electric-gets-182-5-billion-in-obama-buddy-bailout-project-calls-for-jeffery-immelts-immediate-resignation/

  • starchild

    Spammer.